Comments on: Properties of Quantum Oscillators 1

By: Jason

Jason — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:03:11 +0000

nice. Using Griffiths’s notation I see. Perfect in understanding.

By: bien

bien — Sun, 10 May 2009 22:56:06 +0000

I really love ladder operators, very convenient to tackle problems in quantum harmonic oscillators. Thanks to this article.. Nwez, pls incorporate all the minor corrections or make their comments clear. Also, the momentum operator “p”: is it really “partial with respect to x ‘hat’ ?? ”

Overall, the work is great!!

By: bebelyn

bebelyn — Thu, 07 May 2009 09:07:19 +0000

nice job simon! The post is very informative and understandable. Great.

By: Andy

Andy — Sat, 02 May 2009 18:00:20 +0000

A nice representation on quantum oscillators, the only thing that is bugging me is on the calculation of a+-, where does the i term come from in +- imwx? Cheers

By: debbie

debbie — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:01:27 +0000

it is a bit not quite nice to say in this post, you can just say the subject directly.. just a suggestion. this entry is very informative considering that annihilation and creation might create a bit of confusion to people not that inclined to QM. Good Job!

By: pearl francisco

pearl francisco — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:45:29 +0000

Hi Simon, nice post I may say. The way you presented the solutions is great, very understandable. Though I guess you misspelled the word Schodinger. Just a minor mistake.

By: Ancelie

Ancelie — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:47:21 +0000

wow..a very nice article..it elucidates the concept on quantum oscillators.the presentation is very nice..the solutions to the problems are presented in detail. however, it seems that part c & d are blurred.. and pwede i-black na lang tanan. keep up the good work Simon.