Basics of Linear Vector Spaces
by CARIEL O. MONTALBAN
In quantum mechanics, I have learned that the wavefunctions,
, reside in Hilbert’s space. What is Hilbert’s space? I guess to answer this question requires exploring the basic properties of Hilbert’s space.
Hilbert’s space is a linear vector space whose elements, entities or components obey certain rules or axioms. This means firstly than you can add these elements and the resulting sum is also as a member or entity of that space. Secondly, you can multiply the elements with any arbitrary scalar and the product yields something which is also a component of that same space. Additionally, the operations of addition and multiplication obey definite rules. These rules are called axioms for addition and multiplication.
By means of simple problems discussed below, I illustrate these axioms which are obeyed by a linear vector space and to which the wavefunctions,
, of quantum mechanics belongs.
As a simple example, let us consider the set of all entities of the form
where
are real numbers. Do these form a linear vector space? First, we have know how these elements are added and how they multiply with scalars. If their addition and multiplication are defined respectively as follows:
and
we can then verify that the axioms required for a linear vector space are satisfied in this case.
From the addition operation, we can write the null vector of the set
as:
Also from the multiplication operation, we can then write down the inverse of
simply as
.
We can now verify that all four axioms for addition of elements of the set
are satisfied.
First Axiom: Commutativity Property
The operation of addition in a linear vector space is commutative; which means that we don’t care about the order in which the elements are added because we always get the same result. This axiom is written as:
Our proof is as follows. Let and
.
Then,
Thus in a linear vector, the addition of vectors is commutative.
Second Axiom: Associative Property
The operation of addition in a linear vector space is associative which means that we don’t care about the order in which two elements are added to the third one because we always get the same result. This axiom is expressed as:
To prove this in the case of the set , we let
Then,
Therefore the addition of vectors in a linear vector space is associative.
Third Axiom: Existence of an identity element
The third requirement for a set to be a linear vector space is that the identity element exists. The identity element is defined as
The identity element of the set
is therefore none other than the null vector
To show this property, we just apply the definition of addition hence
Fourth Axiom: Existence of an inverse
The inverse of a vector should exist in a linear vector space. The inverse is defined by the statement
For the set
we can then verify the existence of an inverse as follows:
Examples of non-vector spaces
From the four axioms of addition of linear vector space, we can further make the following observations.
(1) If
are required to be positive numbers, we can’t construct a vector space because Axiom (iv) will not be satisfied.
(2) The vectors of the form
do not form a linear vector space. To show this, we let
where
are all real numbers.
Then by Axiom (i),
Thus,
does not form a linear vector space. The closure property is clearly violated since
.
About the Author:
CARIEL O. MONTALBAN finished his B.S. in Physics from Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology (MSU-IIT), Iligan City, Philippines in March 2008 and is now a graduate student of the same university. He hopes to become an active researcher in the field of experimental physics in the future.



























February 2nd, 2009 at 3:40 am
Hi Cariel. I don’t know if this will help in any way but I guess there is a little typo in the second sentence of your second paragraph. I think the word there is ‘that’ instead of ‘than’. Also, in the third sentence of your fourth paragraph, the verb there is ‘have known’ instead of ‘have know’. Hope this helps in the refinement of your article.
February 2nd, 2009 at 5:08 am
Hi cariel,
congrats for the job well done. i like your article. it’s very impressive. we will also make our articles like yours. i am refreshed about linear vector spaces with your article. but is that all? please add more. keep up the good work.
February 19th, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Hello Cariel
The article is okey but I think it is nice if you add more discussions on your examples.
February 19th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Cariel!!!
I agree to the suggestions of Miss Maryjane and I just want to suggest also if you could replace the last equation of your article..instead of “not equal to”, you can have it as “not an element ” of the VECTOR SPACE..
In MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS of course..
Thanks…
February 20th, 2009 at 2:31 am
I appreciate the way the article is written. It explains the Linear Vector space in the simplest way understandable to all the readers.
February 22nd, 2009 at 7:21 am
This topic has always been my favorite since I think I understand linear vector space properties well and I thank my excellent mentor for it.
February 23rd, 2009 at 8:18 pm
From physicist point of view, the article is okay and understandable. But as of the whole site, might do something that will really catch the attention of the reader…I mean, if Im not a physicist without knowing some concepts, I might not be interested in reading further…some colors or backgrounds i think might do the magic.
February 24th, 2009 at 12:22 am
Cari hi, the article is very nice but if I were to suggest, maybe it’s much better if the equations were aligned.
February 26th, 2009 at 10:11 pm
I guess the article was okay but it would be nice to make it understandable to more audience so that even if the people without so much background in quantum mechanics could appreciate it.
February 26th, 2009 at 10:40 pm
Good job! The article is very educational.
February 27th, 2009 at 6:13 pm
This post has been included in the 50th Carnival of Mathematics. Stop by and see the other posts at http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/27/50th-carnival-of-mathematics/.
March 3rd, 2009 at 12:15 am
hi, I guess the article is fine. Just make a clearer sets of equations because some of it appeared a bit blurry. Thanks! Congrats, by the way, for a job well done!
March 3rd, 2009 at 12:34 am
I think it is better to put more examples for the application of the axioms. But the discussions you have cariel is nice. Job well done!!!
June 25th, 2009 at 9:41 pm
Mr. Cariel
Our knowledge of vector spaces have been refreshed. Thank you.