Commutation of Spin, Angular and Spin-Orbital Momentum
Marichu T. Miscala
In quantum mechanics, the presence of spin-orbit coupling gives rise to the Hamiltonian that will no longer commute with
, and
, so the spin and orbital momenta are not separately conserved.
In order to understand this concept better, a commutation problem for orbital angular momentum
, spin
, and spin-orbital momentum
is presented here.
-
Consider the fundamental commutation relations for angular momentum. The individual components of the spin
do not commute with each other. That is,
;
;
;
-
The commutation relation for the ‘instrinsic’ angular momentum
is much like a ‘carbon copy’ to that of the ‘extrinsic’ angular momentum 
;
;
;
But the spin-obit Hamiltonian does commute with
,
and the total angular momentum
which is

From the given fundamental commutation relations above, we then now seek the commutators of the following commutation relations:
(a.)
(b.)
(c.) ![[\vec{L}.\vec{S},J]](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_be4bc715500c93516ccba1c932b343f5.png)
(d.)
(e.)
(f.) ![[\vec{L}.\vec{S},J^2]](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_544635ca0f055c52f0e67c5cbb690585.png)
As a hint here,
and
satisfy the fundamental commutation relations for angular momentum, but
and
commute with each other.
(a.) ![[\vec{L} . \vec{S} , L_x] = [L_x S_x + L_y S_y + L_z S_z , L_x]](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_427053c577b8fc63f9e5c54a51c78dc6.png)
![= S_x [L_x, L_x] + S_y [L_y, L_x] + S_z [L_z, L_x]](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_4cb81c50e0a7ea96564aecd13c88150f.png)


same goes for the other two-components, so
![[\vec{L}.\vec{S}, \vec{L}] = i \hbar (\vec{L} \times \vec {S})](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_7b5220656be6a46777792512be174512.png)
(b.)
is identical only with 
![[\vec{L}.\vec{S},\vec{S}] = i \hbar (\vec{S} \times \vec{L})](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_a245d8448693fb7a9fbe4caffd62b208.png)
(c.) ![[\vec{L}.\vec{S},\vec{J}] = [\vec{L}.\vec{S},\vec{L}] + [\vec{L}.\vec{S},\vec{S}] = i \hbar (\vec{L} \times \vec{S} + \vec{S} \times \vec{L}) = 0](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_b12f5cb0df2c908bdf27d988732edfda.png)
(d.)
commutes with all the components of
(and
), so
![[\vec{L} . \vec{S} , L^2] = 0](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_e39a879cb313ae106702b7c354ac508a.png)
(e.) Likewise,
![[\vec{L} . \vec{S} , S^2] = 0](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_c2e29824dc61883f2c17405ebb625631.png)
(f.) ![[\vec{L} . \vec{S} , J^2] = [\vec{L} . \vec{S} , L^2] + [\vec{L} . \vec{S} , S^2] + 2[\vec{L} . \vec{S} , \vec{L} . \vec{S}]](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_fb419e2c3fb77d0b8efdda3c32ef5873.png)
where 
The first, second and third terms vanish from the results of (d.) and (e.). Thus,
![[\vec{L} . \vec{S} , J^2] = 0](http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/wp-content/uploads/eq_3426cfd9f0c2b1e92f27949744d6f8ca.png)
This means that the quantities
,
and
are conserved. That is, the eigenstates of
and
are not “good” states to use in perturbation theory, but the eigenstates of
,
and
are.
The problem presented here is based on the problem 6.16 from D.J. Griffiths “Introduction to Quantum Mechanics”.
About the author: Marichu T. Miscala is currently taking up her masters in Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology. She is most interested in pursuing a career in advanced research.












